Legal AI for lawyers. Every answer guessedcited.

NeoLaw is an AI-powered legal workspace, with AI models running on our own GPU cluster. It supports legal research, document drafting and review, and day-to-day workflows, from timesheets to pre-bills. Built around Cypriot legislation and case law, it brings legal sources and practical tools together in one platform.

Limassol
AI models on our own GPU servers in Cyprus
EU
Application and client data hosted in the EU
ISO/IEC 27001 · 9001
Certified security and quality management

Legal Agent

A client is buying a Cypriot company and asks about warranty claims. Watch the agent research before it answers.

Legal Agent · new conversation 6 steps · 1 law cited · 30 judgments found
What limitation period applies to a claim for breach of warranty under a share purchase agreement governed by Cypriot law?
  1. Searching legislation12 found“limitation period breach of contract”
  2. Opening the lawconsolidatedLimitation of Actionable Rights Law, 66(I)/2012
  3. Reading section 7word for wordthe section on contract claims
  4. Searching case law30 found“limitation breach of warranty share purchase”
  5. Writing the answer4 sourcesfrom the retrieved material only
  6. Checking citationspassedevery citation was retrieved in this turn

Six years.

Under section 7 of the Limitation of Actionable Rights Law, 66(I)/2012, a claim for breach of contract, including breach of a warranty in a share purchase agreement, must be brought within six years of the date the cause of action arose.1

For the exact date, run /deadline with the date of the breach. The date is calculated in code, not by the model.

Never from memory.At least one search runs before any answer.

Nothing made up.Every section number, date and case name must come from the material it retrieved.

Checked after writing.An automatic check flags any citation the agent did not retrieve.

Skills for the work you repeat

Type a slash command, fill in a short form, and the agent runs that skill directly.

/deadlineLimitation and court deadlinesComputed in code under Law 66(I)/2012 and the Civil Procedure Rules, skipping Cypriot public holidays.
/opinionLegal opinionIssue, rule, application and conclusion, after its own research in Cypriot law.
/letterDemand letterLetterhead-ready, with the response deadline computed for you.
/redlinedocRedline a Word documentYour file back with tracked changes and margin comments.
/quoteStatute sectionThe exact text of a section from a reference such as “s. 7 of 66(I)/2012”.
OutlookYour mailboxConnect it and the agent finds and reads emails and their attachments. Read-only, every access logged.

Case law

Find the judgment that decides the point.

Search 69,898 judgments in English or Greek. NeoLaw translates terms of art both ways, ranks the cases by relevance and summarises each one. Open a judgment in full, ask for a brief, or open a judge’s panel to see their other decisions.

Will a non-compete given on the sale of a business be enforced?
Also searching restraint of tradeContract Law, section 27covenant · geographical areaseverability
SearchingRankingSummarising 3 relevant · 27 more
RelevantSupreme Court2017

Gamma Foods Ltd v. Delta Bakeries Ltd

Civil Appeal No. 214/2013
From the judgment“…a covenant in restraint of trade given on the sale of a business is upheld only so far as it is reasonable in area and duration to protect the goodwill the buyer paid for; what goes further is void to that extent and may be severed…”
Open judgmentBrief
RelevantCourt of Appeal2023

Epsilon Pharmacies Ltd v. Zeta Retail Ltd

Civil Appeal No. E57/2021
Headnote“Sale of business - Goodwill - Non-compete covenant - Contract Law, Cap. 149, section 27 - Whether a five-year, island-wide restraint of trade was reasonable”
Open judgmentBrief
RelevantDistrict Court2020

Theta Travel Ltd v. Iota Tours Ltd

Action No. 1187/2018 · Larnaca
From the judgment“…the restraint of trade was confined to the Larnaca district and to two years, no more than the buyer needed to protect the goodwill it bought; the covenant is enforceable…”
Open judgmentBrief
3 relevant · 27 more under Other results Ask a follow-up about these cases…

Illustrative example: the cases, parties and citations shown are fictitious.

129,653Cypriot judgments, laws and regulations
69,898judgments, from district courts to the Supreme Court
1883–2026law reports and judgments
Holdings quoted word for word from the judgment

Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, Administrative, district, family, labour and rent-control courts · laws and regulations

Contract review

The Seller’s draft arrives. Watch the first pass.

NeoLaw reads the agreement, rates each clause for risk, checks it against your playbook and the drafting, then drafts the fix. You apply or reject every change and download your own .docx.

Share Purchase Agreement · Seller’s draft v1

Seller’s draft v1 · reviewed for the Buyer

Share Purchase Agreement

between Alpha Holdings Ltd (the “Seller”) and Beta Ventures Ltd (the “Buyer”)

4.1

Completion. Completion shall take place on [●] at the offices of the Seller’s advocates in Nicosia.

7.2

Limitation of liability. The aggregate liability of the Seller for all Claims shall not exceed €50,000the Purchase Price.Playbook · Major

8.4

Restrictive covenants. For five (5)three (3) years after Completion, the Seller shall not carry on any business competing with the Business anywhere in the European Unionin Cyprus.Playbook · Minor

11.3

Notices. A notice sent by registered post is deemed received ten (12)twelve (12) days after posting.

12.1

Governing law. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the Republic of Cyprus, subject to Clause 14.3.

Reading

Splitting the Seller’s draft into clauses and defined terms.

Clauses41
Schedules2
Defined terms37
Governing lawCyprus
Legislation consultedContract Law, Cap. 149

Rating risk

Every clause gets a rating. The riskiest get a drafted fix.

7.2Limitation of liabilityHighA €50,000 cap leaves the Buyer exposed on any claim above that sum.
8.4Restrictive covenantsMediumFive years across the EU may be too wide to enforce, which could leave the Buyer with no covenant at all.
4.1CompletionLowCompletion date not yet agreed.

Checking your playbook

Compared with your firm’s standard positions when acting for a buyer.

7.2Liability capMajorFirm standard: cap at 100% of the Purchase Price. Draft: €50,000.
8.4Non-competeMinorFirm standard: three years, Cyprus only, to keep the covenant enforceable. Draft: five years, EU-wide.

Checking the drafting

The errors that survive three rounds of review.

4.1Blank placeholderFill“[●]” where the completion date should be.
11.3Figures and words disagreeFix“ten (12)” days.
12.1Broken cross-referenceFixClause 14.3 does not exist.

Redlining

Nothing changes until a lawyer applies it.

7.2Raise the cap€50,000 → the Purchase Price
8.4Narrow the non-competefive (5) → three (3) years · EU → Cyprus
11.3Fix the notice periodten (12) → twelve (12)
3 suggestions waiting3 changes tracked4.1 and 12.1 left for you

Back to Word

Your original document, with the applied edits as native tracked changes.

FileSPA_v2.docx
Goes back to the Seller asv2
ChangesWord tracked changes
FormattingKept from the original

Negotiation

Their draft comes back. Every word they changed, marked.

Upload the counterparty’s revised draft. NeoLaw compares it with the version you sent, paragraph by paragraph and word by word, even if they didn’t track their changes.

Their v3 halves the cap, adds a fraud carve-out and cuts the non-compete to one year. What does that mean for your client?
Ask the Legal Agent →

Changes in their draft · v2 → v33 changes · 2 clauses

7.2The aggregate liability of the Seller for all Claims shall not exceed 50% of the Purchase Price, save in the case of fraud.

8.4For three (3) years one (1) year after Completion, the Seller shall not carry on any business competing with the Business in Cyprus.

Added by the SellerRemoved by the Seller

Inside the firm

Timesheets, pre-bills and analytics, in the same place.

The work around the legal work. Draft time narratives from rough notes, tidy a pre-bill before it goes to the client, and see where the risk sits across your contracts.

Pre-bill · October.xlsx Figures untouched
DateFee earnerUnitsDescriptionAmount
02.10A.K.5call w client re shares
Attending telephone call with the client regarding the proposed transfer of shares.
€125.00
03.10A.K.15drafting docs for transfer + board
Drafting the board resolutions approving the transfer of shares.
€375.00
03.10M.P.4Preparing and filing the relevant forms with the Registrar of Companies.€100.00
2 improved · 1 unchangedDates, units, rates and totals left as they were
  • Timesheets

    Type what you did in a sentence or two. NeoLaw splits it into entries, marks each one chargeable or non-chargeable and writes the narrative in a consistent house style, in English or Greek. Names and figures are left blank for you to fill in.

    “call w client re share transfer, then drafted the board resolutions” Corporate · Chargeable Attending telephone call with the client regarding the proposed transfer of shares in [ - ].
  • Billing

    Upload the summary statement your billing system exports, as Word or Excel. NeoLaw rewrites the descriptions and refuses any rewrite that would add or drop a figure. Word files come back with tracked changes; Excel files with each change highlighted and the original kept as a comment.

  • Analytics

    Your contracts at a glance: average risk, the highest-risk clauses, a monthly risk trend, playbook deviations by clause type and counterparties ranked by risk. Administrators also see adoption across the firm: active users, feature usage and retention.

    48contracts reviewed
    17high-risk clauses

Control and privacy

You decide what changes. Client documents stay private.

Control

  • Every edit is a suggestion until a lawyer accepts it
  • Every answer shows its sources, with holdings quoted word for word
  • Accounts work only after your administrator approves them
  • Your conversations and contracts are visible only to you

Privacy

NeoLaw’s AI models run on our own GPU servers in Limassol; the application and its data are hosted in the EU. Emails from a connected mailbox are never sent to a cloud AI service. In strict private mode, every request from your firm is answered by a private language model. If it is unavailable, NeoLaw tells you. It does not switch to a public AI service.

Certifications

ISO/IEC 27001Information security management ISO 9001Quality management

Our information security management system is certified to ISO/IEC 27001, and our quality management system to ISO 9001.

Ask us how strict private mode works →
  1. Your document
  2. NeoLawApplication and data, hosted in the EU
  3. Private modelOur own GPU servers in Limassol Public AI servicesClosed in strict private mode

An administrator sets the mode once for the whole firm.

See NeoLaw on your own matter.

Once your account is active, try the Legal Agent, a case search and a first-pass review on a research question and an anonymised agreement you know well.

Create an account and our team will activate it.